What Great Names

… but that’s not what prompted this post – that was this (cough  … a few years ago … I’m just catching up on some background reading). In that post he referenced Brent’s post where Brent highlights the issue of typing a long email and sending it to one person – yet wouldn’t it be cool if it was just out there. I know what he means – I have a few posts in here that started life as an email. So this one is unusual – this is a post first – and then I will email a link to both the chaps – not these chaps – Brent and Manton. Continue reading

            <blockquote>The in-app purchase feature had been removed and replaced with an account sign-up feature clearly intended to circumvent Apple’s in-app purchase rules. That feature exists only for the purpose of avoiding having to pay Apple for your use of the App Store by emailing customers within hours, directing them to subscribe to Spotify on its website. A clear violation of the terms every other developer adheres to…. On June 10, Spotify submitted another version of the app which again incorporated the sign-up feature directing App Store customers to submit an email address so they could be contacted directly by Spotify in a continued attempt to get around our guidelines.</blockquote>

 Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell – full letter on the clickthrough

This all seems to have started with Elizabeth Warren’s speech a couple of days ago. (Warning – you need Flash to watch this speech (seriously), so I haven’t watched it – but read enough that links back to that site …

Fortune : On Apple, Warren pointed to the company’s streaming-music service Apple Music, saying that the company has made it “difficult” for competing services, like Spotify, to compete with Apple Music. This is Gruber on that topic. I agree, particularly on that last sentence.

Cry me a river. Spotify has long charged $12.99 via in-app subscriptions to get around the 30 percent “App Store tax”. And Apple has now cut the long-term subscription split from 70-30 to 85-15. And Spotify is the streaming service most at war with artists over their abysmal royalty rates.

Fortune : She also seemed to side with allegations from “thousands of authors” that Amazon tries to “steer consumers to books published by Amazon to the detriment of other publishers.”

Ahem – does she remember this case that Apple lost around price fixing. Now THERE was an opportunity.

            Lots of distinction between Apple, Google and Facebook, even more so when it comes to privacy. Clue - Apple's product is very clear. Googles and Facebooks? You have to look into a mirror.

All of this great work in iOS 10 would be meaningless if it came at the expense of your privacy.

Apple SVP Craig Federighi

“It’s a powerful technology that allows us to use information from users and still maintain user privacy,” said Apple’s Sebastien Marineau-Mes in remarks during the keynote event.

Still, it’s a relatively new approach. And despite the emphasis on privacy, critics worry whether any amount of shrouding of data is enough to guard private information.

.. I wonder if those are the same critics that fill up John Gruber’s Claim Chowder drawer.

Source – Recode