It’s Simple Isn’t It?
You are in a grocery store and while your goods are being checked out by the cashier, you ‘wave’ your phone at the terminal and done … right?
Well, only if you make the right choices that are actually all outside of Apple’s control. Continue reading
Talking From Both Sides Of His Mouth
It’s not just Trump …. Jacob Siegal – who knows nothing more about the new Apple phone than everybody else has decided that despite a headline that casts Apple into the dustbin of technology: “Delays and an inflated price could doom the iPhone 8“, he’s going to keep all his options open.
Apparently the new phone is so expensive that people won’t buy it – but still Apple won’t be able to satisfy the demand …
new components and features of the phone are expected to drive the price up to around $1,000, which would make it prohibitively expensive.
and in the very next sentence …
the company could face significant constraints when it comes to manufacturing enough phones to satisfy demand.
You can’t make this stuff up … which is why I tip my hat to the antler tippers …
Why Would Forrester’s CEO Do This?
Here’s the link – don’t bother with the click through. It opens …
It needs the company’s AI software Watson in its fight against Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Amazon.
Apple is in a death match …
Well I – and many others – would disagree.
No – Not This
I wrote this just over 4 years ago and talked about Apple moving to becoming a direct service provider. And here we are 4 years later – and Apple is still not a direct service provider … except – did you spot that Virgin Mobile Partners with Apple to Go iPhone-only with $1 Service
This article makes for an interesting read. David absolutely knows what he is talking about – and I am absolutely no retail pro – just an observer from the outside – so it would be foolish to question his analysis. That said, I couldn’t resist building on it to try to shed light on what might be going.
Thoughts. Observations. Call them what you will …
Add Jason Calacancis to the legions that quite simply don’t get Apple. I am sure Jason know’s a lot about a lot. He is definitely way more famous than I am … and probably richer … so he must know what he is talking about …. right? Sorry, on this occasion – I disagree.
He published this on LinkedIN today detailing the six reasons why ‘smart folks’ are worried about apple. Continue reading
The in-app purchase feature had been removed and replaced with an account sign-up feature clearly intended to circumvent Apple’s in-app purchase rules. That feature exists only for the purpose of avoiding having to pay Apple for your use of the App Store by emailing customers within hours, directing them to subscribe to Spotify on its website. A clear violation of the terms every other developer adheres to…. On June 10, Spotify submitted another version of the app which again incorporated the sign-up feature directing App Store customers to submit an email address so they could be contacted directly by Spotify in a continued attempt to get around our guidelines.
Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell – full letter on the clickthrough
This all seems to have started with Elizabeth Warren’s speech a couple of days ago. (Warning – you need Flash to watch this speech (seriously), so I haven’t watched it – but read enough that links back to that site …
Fortune : On Apple, Warren pointed to the company’s streaming-music service Apple Music, saying that the company has made it “difficult” for competing services, like Spotify, to compete with Apple Music. This is Gruber on that topic. I agree, particularly on that last sentence.
Cry me a river. Spotify has long charged $12.99 via in-app subscriptions to get around the 30 percent “App Store tax”. And Apple has now cut the long-term subscription split from 70-30 to 85-15. And Spotify is the streaming service most at war with artists over their abysmal royalty rates.
Fortune : She also seemed to side with allegations from “thousands of authors” that Amazon tries to “steer consumers to books published by Amazon to the detriment of other publishers.”
Ahem – does she remember this case that Apple lost around price fixing. Now THERE was an opportunity.
I am sure Mr. Dvorak is a very able and competent journalist – after-all he has made his living out of it for years. That said, this article is not the proof you seek.
What a crock.
It clearly demonstrates that he stands in line with so many people that just do not get what Apple is up to.
UPDATE : Just saw this from the Macalope – who agrees.
Lots of distinction between Apple, Google and Facebook, even more so when it comes to privacy. Clue – Apple’s product is very clear. Googles and Facebooks? You have to look into a mirror.
All of this great work in iOS 10 would be meaningless if it came at the expense of your privacy.
Apple SVP Craig Federighi
“It’s a powerful technology that allows us to use information from users and still maintain user privacy,” said Apple’s Sebastien Marineau-Mes in remarks during the keynote event.
Still, it’s a relatively new approach. And despite the emphasis on privacy, critics worry whether any amount of shrouding of data is enough to guard private information.
.. I wonder if those are the same critics that fill up John Gruber’s Claim Chowder drawer.
Source – Recode