<p style="text-align: center;"> ... For 'Podcast' Read 'Blog'.
For ‘Episode’ Read ‘Post’.
please pay attention.
<p style="text-align: center;"> ... For 'Podcast' Read 'Blog'.
For ‘Episode’ Read ‘Post’.
please pay attention.
<img class="size-full wp-image-8100" src="http://beyondbridges.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/airbnb.jpg" alt="A 3D printed people's models are seen in front of a displayed Airbnb logo in this illustration taken, June 8, 2016. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration" width="644" height="401" />
More pesky government bodies getting in the way of tech, because according to SF …
“It’s not regulating user content at all – it’s regulating the business activity of the hosting platform itself.”
What do you think?
Source: Reuters Airbnb sues San Francisco over registration policy
One email I got from my recent Brexit posts asked the following;
You can argue that acceptance of an English identity is the reverse of racism or nativism, e.g. the mature embrace of one’s culture without the need to impose it on others or to deny the value of other cultures.
However, my question about all ‘identity’ issues is: how fine do we go? Regional (the North vs. the Midlands)? Civic? Language? Hobbies? Down to the level of the individual?
.. good question, to which I do not have a specific answer, other than the ‘will of the people’. I have heard it said that the day Texas secedes from ‘The Union’, so too will Austin secede from Texas. It’s a lot to do with the ‘will of the people’ and similar in vein to the one that connects to how much time must pass before things should be repatriated.
The Elgin marbles have been in the UK for a little over 200 years – and at last check 40% of people in the UK feel that they should be returned to Greece. We still aren’t even at a 50.01 % majority and that vote is less than the combined ‘won’t vote / no opinion of 45%.
I know about the marbles – but still, put me in the ‘no opinion’ camp – I just don’t know enough. Sadly that doesn’t stop people voting in real elections, which might explain the pickle we are in.We now see that Scotland is pushing for another referendum, they have strong benefits of the EU and given that they significantly voted ‘Remain’ and only just lost the independence vote, I suspect a new referendum would see Scotland breaking away and joining the EU.
Separately, I don’t quite see the logic of being so adamant on your independence that the first thing you do is subjugate yourselves to something even larger and more controlling … go figure. Still we know that Scottish Nationalism is alive and well, and if I was a betting man – then the Scots will break away. I suspect also that Northern Ireland will go the same way for different reasons. But that might take longer.
And so, back to the Elgin Marbles, once all this is said and done, who then is in control of The British Museum (current home of the Marbles) … and who gets to decide where they go? It really isn’t clear cut. Around countries – it will be the will of the people. This is why the USA won’t be returned to the original natives of the continent any time soon – they just don’t have the vote!
Yorkshire people are proud of their heritage and are very clear on their identity – but I am not sure that there is a serious movement to ‘do a Scotland’. But heh – we are in a new era!
If that doesn’t answer the question – you know who you are … ping me back!
I am sure Mr. Dvorak is a very able and competent journalist - after-all he has made his living out of it for years. That said, <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/commentary/345453/apple-should-spin-off-the-macintosh" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this article</a> is not the proof you seek.
It clearly demonstrates that he stands in line with so many people that just do not get what Apple is up to.
This is my favorite <a href="http://brightside.me/article/20-utterly-unique-historical-photographs-youve-never-seen-before-59105/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">from this selection</a>.
I worry about the 18-24 and the 25-34 demographics.
I would love to know what percentage of those groups actually voted. We do know that the younger people did not turn out in the droves that older people did. (Even though they are going to live with the consequences – which on the whole – the ‘old fart’ brigade will not.) I have this feeling that if the youth cared – the vote would have gone the other way. So why don’t they care?
<a href="http://bizcatalyst360.com/brexit-its-about-freedom-choice-and-democracy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">My article on Brexit was published on BizCatalyst</a>. In it I provide my take on the Brexit Vote. Going forward, as I see other quotes that catch my eye, I will call them out here.<!--more-->
Meanwhile a section of London-based commentariat anthropologised the British working class as though they were a lesser evolved breed from distant parts, all too often portraying them as bigots who did not know what was good for them. Having assumed themselves cosmopolitan, the more self-aware pundits began to realise just how parochial they were: having experienced much of the world, they discovered they didn’t know their own country as well as they might.
A big part of the debate has been about economics – jobs and trade and prosperity – but my hunch is that voters will decide less on economics than on culture and questions of identity and belonging.
Michael Sandel in the New Statesman (even before the vote)
Anthony Barnett points out the unpalatable truth that this is England’s referendum, born of a need to placate English nativism, swung by English counties. His conclusion is that English nationalism will have to be constitutionalised sooner or later (eg with an English parliament) and that this will be an opportunity for radical voices to be heard and a positive, diverse Englishness to emerge.
It takes 10 minutes – but well worth a listen/watch.
For what was surely a decisive number of Brexit voters, the vote was not a considered view that leaving the EU would be better than remaining, but rather was a vehicle for sending a message to British elites.
The majority vote by Britons to leave the European Union was an act of raw democracy. Millions of ordinary people refused to be bullied, intimidated and dismissed with open contempt by their presumed betters in the major parties, the leaders of the business and banking oligarchy and the media.
Seven voters in ten expected a victory for remain, including a majority (54%) of those who voted to leave. Leave voters who voted UKIP at the 2015 election were the only group who (by just 52% to 48%) expected a leave victory.
… when voters feel disenfranchised, ill-informed or not, disrespecting them leads to convulsions — such as those that we’re experiencing in our country.
The British vote feels momentous, but we will most likely look back at it as merely the first in a series of fights for the soul of Europe. The outpouring of anger and anti-establishment aggression in Europe has only begun.
The dissatisfaction you see in Britain is also present in other countries, including my own,” he told reporters as he left The Hague for a summit of European leaders in Brussels. “This has to be a stimulus for more reform, more welfare.
This list of 8 was originally published on the BBC site. <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36574526" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Click through if you want to see what they have to say.</a> Read on if you want to read what I have to say.
Of course they did – the arguments were being made by people that the ‘man in the street’ simply do not trust.
Yes it did. And it was debunked. By many people. Many times. Continually. But nobody stopped Boris trundling round the country in his big red bus and declaring it to be true.
The comparison to ‘The Donald’ is clear, which roughly translates as the establishment ( I hate the word ‘elites’ – they are not – they are just people who benefit form maintaining the status quo) know the claim to be wrong and people will just see through it and vote accordingly.
From where I sit, Farage was but one of a raft of ‘establishment’ people for Brexit, with many other cases being made. The media picked up on the lowest common denominator and ran with it. And they continue to do so. For example, Buzzfeed did an excellent post on newspaper front pages from around the world. I did a quick tally on who was featured on the front page
BTW – interesting to note that only Boris gets first name recognition – it’s so strong that he might just do a ‘Prince’, ‘Madonna’, ’Bjork’, ‘Beyoncé’ or ‘Cher’ ( I think that covers off all possible generational debate).
It is clear that Nigel Farage was positioned as the driver last Friday.
Stopped listening? If I might ‘channel Alice’ for a moment … how can you stop if you never started?
… goodness – not even Gordon Brown and Sadiq Khan could get their message across. Are you kidding me ?
Gordon Brown has clearly demonstrated two things;
(And where was Tony Bliar (sic)? Oh right. Even less people listen to him these days – thank god.)
And Sadiq Kahn? My god how short the media’s memory is … Sadiq won his election on May 5th of this year – until then, Zac Goldsmith, with overwhelming support of the media, had essentially positioned him as a terrorist – and now on a dime we want the public to spin round and listen to him – and act on his recommendations?
Good strategy (if potentially self serving their personal ambitions) behind the ‘double act’ and good communicators – say what you like about Boris – he engages.
… pesky old farts … but this was so much about the future – where the HELL were the youth? Those that turned out overwhelmingly voted for remain. There just weren’t enough of them.
Slightly? Totally .… but not for why you might think. I’m getting there, because this out of all of the 8 reasons is the one that starts to touch on the issue I think is core.
A more complete analysis can be found here.
Meanwhile – think about this.
If just 634,751 people (about 1% of the UK’s population) had voted to stay not go – the UK would not be leaving the EU. Now maybe there’s a reason why the youth that didn’t vote should have?
<pre>This was originally part of <a href="http://beyondbridges.net/2016/04/prince-pantone-blockchain-brexit-1999/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a post that I published on April 22nd of this year</a>. Today, the day after the United Kingdom voted to exit Europe I am republishing it as a standalone piece. To remind myself of where I stood. And stand.The click though piece is written by Simon Wardley. He doesn't usually write on this kind of stuff - which is probably why it hit me.</pre>
… as they say in ‘Blighty’.
If you are paying attention you will know that the UK are ‘about’ (June 23rd) to vote on whether The UK should exit the EU .. or stick with it. If you know of Brexit … then you are already tracking the for and against opinions. So I am not going to reference them all here.
If you don’t know of Brexit – stop reading. Now.
But – going back to the premise that you do know what it is, and you are wondering which way to vote. Read this. If that’s too long – then let me summarize with a single quote from Simon’s article.
To vote to remain, I would be doing the same to my son that was done to me. What would I say when he was older – I took away your power and gave it, without your permission, without thought for your future to unelected bureaucrats for a bit of security, safety and better job prospects?
Ok. Off you go.
As a quick fact check, Corbyn (the ‘Bern’ of the UK) is for staying in. Fan though I am of Bern and Jeremy, J seems to be at odds with my thoughts. Boris ? He’s for out. Yup. Obama – he wants us to stay in. But we know that ‘Merica never – ever – is thinking about what is right for the ‘other’ country. So call me suspicious.
Bottom line – I am with Simon. It’s the long game I am interested in and democracy that I want.
The sentiments are probably on a lot of people's minds today ... #Brexit